This is the mail archive of the
java-prs@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: gcj/173
- To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: gcj/173
- From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
- Date: 15 Mar 2000 20:00:01 -0000
- Cc: java-prs at sourceware dot cygnus dot com,
- Reply-To: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
The following reply was made to PR gcj/173; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
To: java-gnats@sourceware.cygnus.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: gcj/173
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 11:54:18 -0800 (PST)
Bryce McKinlay writes:
> I like that slightly better, but maybe "Cannot create instance of
> non-static inner class from static context" is all it really needs.
That forces you to handle both cases (static, non static)
separately. What I'll do is keep the "No enclosing instance for inner
class `%s' is in scope" and I'll add the "an explicit one must be
provided when creating this inner class." when in a non static
context.
./A