This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Please help test libffi 3.0.11-rc3

From: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
To: Anthony Green <green at moxielogic dot com>
Cc: libffi-discuss at sourceware dot org, David Gilbert <david dot gilbert at linaro dot org>, GCJ-patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 13:28:54 +0200
Subject: Re: Please help test libffi 3.0.11-rc3
References: <CACxje586xNJF1J4mOZeqD9HCUbuR7iK6Eb+dtYCUEZ3y12zagA@mail.gmail.com> <4F7F5233.7060508@ubuntu.com> <CACxje59J6pSHYsiZwNCM=AOix9FpOv9U+o1J0Rjkmp=_uH=kqg@mail.gmail.com>

On 06.04.2012 23:01, Anthony Green wrote:

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Matthias Klose<doko@ubuntu.com> wrote:

I see that some of the armhf-variadic patches are not applied, attached.
  Please could you confirm if dropping these changes is deliberate?


Could you please double check this?  I see that the two test case
tweaks are missing, but the third patch fragment seems wrong.
src/arc/ffi.c does include ffi_prep_cif_machdep_var().

you are right about ffi.c, just the test case patches are missing.

References:
- Re: Please help test libffi 3.0.11-rc3
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: Please help test libffi 3.0.11-rc3
  - From: Anthony Green

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]