This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Disable static build for libjava


On 07/07/11 18:02, David Daney wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 09:57 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 07/07/2011 06:51 PM, David Daney wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2011 09:27 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>> As discussed at the Google GCC gathering, disable the build of static libraries
>>>> in libjava, which should cut the build time of libjava by 50%.  The static
>>>> libjava build isn't useful out of the box, and I don't see it packaged by Linux
>>>> distributions either.
>>>>
>>>> The AC_PROG_LIBTOOL check is needed to get access to the enable_shared macro.
>>>> I'm unsure about the check in the switch construct. Taken from libtool.m4, and
>>>> determining the value of enable_shared_with_static_runtimes.
>>>>
>>>> Ok for the trunk?
>>>>
>>>> 2011-07-07  Matthias Klose<doko@ubuntu.com>
>>>>
>>>>           * Makefile.def (target_modules/libjava): Pass
>>>>           $(libjava_disable_static).
>>>>           * configure.ac: Check for libtool, pass --disable-static
>>>>           in libjava_disable_static.
>>>>           * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
>>>>           * configure: Likewise.
>>>>
>>>
>>> My autoconf fu is not what it used to be.  It is fine if static libraries are
>>> disabled by default, but it should be possible to enable them from the configure
>>> command line.  It is unclear to me if this patch does that.
>>
>> no. I assume an extra option --enable-static-libjava would be needed.
> 
> Not being a libjava maintainer, I cannot force you to add something like 
> that as part of the patch, but I think it would be a good idea.

I think so.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]