Re: [PATCH, take 2] Build java as two separate DLLs on windows.

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Dave Korn wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>>   Here's the final version of my libjava-as-dlls patch.  Nobody had anything
>>> much to say about the first draft so I take it there were no obvious massive
>>> flaws; 
>> No, you take it that I was AFK for a few days and didn't have the time
>> to look at it.
> 
>   Well not exactly, I had no idea where you were, I'm not following you
> around, honest!  (And I was including other maintainers from both java and gcc
> sides in that reference, nobody else volunteered an opinion either.  It wasn't
> in any way a pointed comment directed at you personally.)

Sure, I know.  At this time of year reviewing can get a bit slow.  :-)

>>>   Bootstrapped at -j4 on i686-pc-cygwin.  Tests currently running, results
>>> anticipated in a few hours.  Assuming (as I have every reason to expect) no
>>> regressions, OK for HEAD?
>> Please wait for approval.
> 
>   Of course, I thought that went without saying.  When I write "OK for HEAD?",
> it is a request for review and approval, so I thought that's exactly what I
> was doing already.  (I don't actually go round checking stuff in without
> permission do I?)

Don't take it wrong: I'm not complaining, just explaining.

I also wanted to let the other gcj maintainers know that I am interested in
this patch and will try to review it.

Andrew.