This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, Timothy Wall <twalljava at dev dot java dot net>, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libffi-discuss at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:00:04 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] win64 support for libffi (2/2)
- References: <635C3243-B89E-460E-9C0F-209308D89729@dev.java.net> <b609cb3b0905171605tc6a10b7u683c43a99f97382f@mail.gmail.com> <4A109F74.6060108@gmail.com> <4DB6E56B-C18E-4021-84BD-EAE566EC0A65@dev.java.net> <4A112C2D.8060008@redhat.com> <4A11776F.5010003@gmail.com> <4A1177C8.4050602@redhat.com>
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>> The libffi ABI has changed? Are you sure?
>> No, I'm not clear, I'm repeating something I was told second-hand:
>>
>> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2009-02/msg00051.html
>>
>> Maybe I just meant that the API has changed, not the ABI?
>
> Neither have changed AFAIAA. There are some updates and fixes in gcc
> that are not yet in upstream libffi.
Ok, this is what I mean:
admin@ubik /tmp/libffi/upstream
$ tail -2 /tmp/libffi/upstream/libffi-3.0.8/libtool-version
# CURRENT:REVISION:AGE
5:9:0
admin@ubik /tmp/libffi/upstream
$ tail -2 /gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/libtool-version
# CURRENT:REVISION:AGE
4:1:0
admin@ubik /tmp/libffi/upstream
$
cheers,
DaveK