This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] m68k support for libjava

From: Roman Zippel <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc at littlepinkcloud dot COM>
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, tromey at redhat dot com, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 19:22:14 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [RFC] m68k support for libjava
References: <18089.9057.137060.223256@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <m3vec6sqf5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <jesl5ru85t.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <46E02CC1.4050403@ubuntu.com> <18144.11794.916293.920945@zebedee.pink>

Hi,

On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Andrew Haley wrote:

> Please send libgcj test results.  In particular I'm interested to see
> how well signal handling works.

I don't know if they were ever send to gcc-patches and I don't usually 
test it, as it really takes ages.
Anyway, the last results I'm certain of are with Debian gcc 4.1 and this 
had no regressions compared to i386, but it depends on all exception 
handling issues being fixed (mainly incorrect Dwarf information).

bye, Roman

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] m68k support for libjava
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- [RFC] m68k support for libjava
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: [RFC] m68k support for libjava
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFC] m68k support for libjava
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [RFC] m68k support for libjava
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: [RFC] m68k support for libjava
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]