This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ARM EABI and eclipse-ecj

From: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc at littlepinkcloud dot COM>
To: Steven Newbury <s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk>
Cc: aph at all6500 dot kos dot to, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:08:27 +0100
Subject: Re: ARM EABI and eclipse-ecj
References: <18131.56752.293473.183448@zebedee.pink> <622847.44026.qm@web25015.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

Steven Newbury writes:
 > 
 > --- Andrew Haley <aph-gcc@littlepinkcloud.COM> wrote:
 
 > > I just got a nearly perfect set of test scores.  Throw_2 is expected
 > > (indeed, designed) to fail, so no problem there.  TestClosureGC is a
 > > weird one, but not worth worrying about ATM.  As far as I can see
 > > we're good to go.
 > > 
 > > Let me know your results.
 > 
 > I won't be able to do much until later in the week.  I have noticed that gij is
 > quite a bit slower than jamvm (using libffi) on some benchmark tests,

That's true on all platforms: gij is a very simple bytecode
interpreter.  gcj wins with precompilation.

Andrew.

References:
- Re: ARM EABI and eclipse-ecj
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: ARM EABI and eclipse-ecj
  - From: Steven Newbury

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]