This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Richard Sandiford wrote:
In the first case, you are probably correct. We are copying the pointer into a wider type. In practice it does not matter because all valid user space pointers have the high bit clear so there would never be a case where the not sign extending would produce a different result than if you did sign extend.Ah, so we don't support running libffi from kernel space? I was assuming we needed to cope with both. If we don't, it is indeed a non-issue.
It sounds like carelessness to me -- I would watch out.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |