This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 06:10:04 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
References: <20070527182203.GA12846@lucon.org> <20070527182317.GA21785@lucon.org> <465C0461.2060605@ubuntu.com>

On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:45:53PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> H. J. Lu schrieb:
> 
> > 2007-05-27  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> >
> > 	PR libjava/32078
> > 	* ltmain.sh: Update from gcc toplevel.
> 
> > 	* libtool.m4: New. Copied from from gcc toplevel.
> > 	* ltsugar.m4: Likewise.
> > 	* ltversion.m4: Likewise.
> > 	* ltoptions.m4: Likewise.
> 
> why copy these? libjava/HACKING mentions to use -I flags to use them from the
> toplevel directory.

I think ltmain.sh in classpath was used.  If it is true, will
-I use ltmain.sh from the toplevel directory?


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR libjava/32078: Update libtool in classpath
  - From: Matthias Klose

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]