This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Symbol visibility for gcj
- From: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:49:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: Symbol visibility for gcj
- References: <17924.6636.434128.707456@zebedee.pink>
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 18:18 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I don't believe it should cause any problems, but it is possible that
> this will break some code that was using CNI to access private symbols
> inside a DSO. I don't think we care about that.
For CNI we seem to treat package private members as visible. Is using
package private members from CNI still supported/will it be kept
supported, or should such usage be turned into java protected members?
Cheers,
Mark