This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: merge new tools.jar classes from GNU Classpath

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Date: 12 Mar 2007 13:45:02 -0600
Subject: Re: RFA: merge new tools.jar classes from GNU Classpath
References: <45F063E3.6080705@redhat.com> <m3r6ru5kso.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45F5B01B.60405@redhat.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Tom" == Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> Ideally I'd like this patch in Fedora 7, yes.  Is your concern that
Tom> adding it now will complicate the next Classpath merge?

Yeah, though I suppose it is a bit late to be worrying about that :)

>> Also, it seems a little weird to be importing gjdoc when we know that
>> it needs major work, and while we are actively looking at an
>> alternative.  What's up with that?

Tom> I'm not proposing merging gjdoc itself.

Ok, thanks, I didn't notice that.  Well, I did think gjdoc was a lot
bigger, but I ignored myself :).

Please go ahead.  Thanks.

Tom

References:
- RFA: merge new tools.jar classes from GNU Classpath
  - From: Thomas Fitzsimmons
- Re: RFA: merge new tools.jar classes from GNU Classpath
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: merge new tools.jar classes from GNU Classpath
  - From: Thomas Fitzsimmons

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]