This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Get libffi closures to cope with SELinux execmem/execmod

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 05 Mar 2007 06:02:14 -0700
Subject: Re: Get libffi closures to cope with SELinux execmem/execmod
References: <ork5zkiz8v.fsf@redhat.com> <m3fy982f0l.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <ormz3bt6el.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

Alexandre> On Feb 15, 2007, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>> It is ok to have the libjava code directly call ffi_closure_alloc and
>> ffi_closure_free.  We're already making direct calls to the various
>> ffi functions, so this extra layer isn't needed.

Alexandre> Done in the revised patch below.  Retested on
Alexandre> x86_64-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?

If there are no other remaining objections or concerns, then yes.
(I forgot the state of the thread while traveling :-)

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Get libffi closures to cope with SELinux execmem/execmod
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Get libffi closures to cope with SELinux execmem/execmod
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Get libffi closures to cope with SELinux execmem/execmod
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Get libffi closures to cope with SELinux execmem/execmod
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]