This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)

From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>, Lee Millward <lee dot millward at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:03:45 -0500
Subject: Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
References: <45D34986.5070401@codesourcery.com> <45D4F2FF.4030503@codesourcery.com> <20070216085053.GA11868@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200702161545.33828.steven@gcc.gnu.org>

Steven Bosscher wrote:

On Friday 16 February 2007 09:50, Jan Hubicka wrote:

Hi,
this is report from memory tester, overall it seems to be slight memory
consumption increase. Are there any plans to get the memory back?


Sandra said in a mail last week that there is supposed to be a ~2%
memory saving (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00945.html).
That is a number that should be visible in your measurements.  Are you
and Sandra measuring the same thing?

I expect that the current mainline version does show a memory use regression. As I mentioned in another e-mail, I have two additional patches from the LTO branch that I need to bring over to clobber some critical cases where temporary lists are being constructed. I will try to get to that today. Anyway, my measurements on the LTO branch were made with those two additional patches in place.

-Sandra

Follow-Ups:
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Sandra Loosemore
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Sandra Loosemore
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]