This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>, Lee Millward <lee dot millward at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:45:33 +0100
- Subject: Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
- References: <45D34986.5070401@codesourcery.com> <45D4F2FF.4030503@codesourcery.com> <20070216085053.GA11868@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Friday 16 February 2007 09:50, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this is report from memory tester, overall it seems to be slight memory
> consumption increase. Are there any plans to get the memory back?
Sandra said in a mail last week that there is supposed to be a ~2%
memory saving (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00945.html).
That is a number that should be visible in your measurements. Are you
and Sandra measuring the same thing?
Gr.
Steven