This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)

From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Brooks Moses <brooks dot moses at codesourcery dot com>, Lee Millward <lee dot millward at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:25:14 -0500
Subject: Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
References: <45D34986.5070401@codesourcery.com> <m3ire3gjbz.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45D4DCA0.3050202@codesourcery.com> <m3abzfgit3.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45D4F2FF.4030503@codesourcery.com> <84fc9c000702160225q645fe4c0u1d448f94c766a2d9@mail.gmail.com> <19c433eb0702160229g7e993601u3c286eb441a6dca6@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000702160304h68ba42a0i9bd9a7eb8ba91fb6@mail.gmail.com>

Richard Guenther wrote:

On 2/16/07, François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ada seems to be broken:

From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00911.html:

"This change breaks the Ada front end. Back last year when I undertook
this project on the LTO branch, the Ada maintainers said they would
take responsibility for updating their code if/when the changes made
it back to mainline. Brooks, Lee, and I can help out with that if
necessary, but we'd really like to get the other changes committed
first before they undergo another round of bit-rot. I know there is
also more work that could be done on the other front ends to avoid
constructing unnecessary temporary arglists, for further memory use
improvements rather than correctness."


Uh - I didn't notice that we now can break non-default frontends with
cleanup patches.  Nice! (?)

I'll be happy to prepare a patch for the Ada front end, but I'm not set up to test it. Richard, would you be willing to help with that?

-Sandra

Follow-Ups:
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Sandra Loosemore
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Sandra Loosemore
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Sandra Loosemore
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: revised PATCH: CALL_EXPR representation changes, part 0/9 (table of contents)
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]