This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: foo_LDFLAGS disappears when I run 'autoreconf'

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Adam Megacz <megacz at cs dot berkeley dot edu>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 22 Dec 2006 17:18:43 -0700
Subject: Re: foo_LDFLAGS disappears when I run 'autoreconf'
References: <x3hcvo779x.fsf@nowhere.com> <m3wt4kb4wb.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <x3tzzn7p8b.fsf_-_@nowhere.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Megacz <megacz@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:

Adam> This vanishes when I run 'autoreconf'.  Is something wrong with
Adam> my autoconf installation?  I'm using debian's automake
Adam> 1.10+nogfdl-1 and autoconf 2.61-1.

Perhaps automake changed.  I haven't really been following...

These days the gcc tree is standardized on autoconf 2.59 and automake
1.9.6 -- see gcc/doc/install.texi.  So, you need these versions in
order to modify the auto* input files.

We'll have to look at this and all those other warnings when we
upgrade to automake 1.10.  Whenever that happens, the whole tree will
have to be updated at once.  I believe there's been a couple threads
on one of the main gcc lists about what is blocking this work.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: foo_LDFLAGS disappears when I run 'autoreconf'
  - From: Adam Megacz

References:
- uncertain patch: foo_LINK needs foo_LDFLAGS
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: uncertain patch: foo_LINK needs foo_LDFLAGS
  - From: Tom Tromey
- foo_LDFLAGS disappears when I run 'autoreconf'
  - From: Adam Megacz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]