This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: patch: use $(CXX_FOR_TARGET) in LIBLINK
Adam Megacz writes:
>
> Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
>
> >>> 2006-12-21 Adam Megacz <megacz@cs.berkeley.edu>
> >>> * Makefile.am: use $(CXX_FOR_TARGET) in LIBLINK.
> >>> * Makefile.in: regenerate.
>
> > There shouldn't be any difference between CXX and CXX_FOR_TARGET in a
> > target library.
>
> Yes, I started to wonder about this too. I've found that the problem
> of $(CXX)="g++" happens only if I force the configury to regenerate
> $(target)/libjava/Makefile by doing this:
>
> rm $(target)/libjava/Makefile
> rm $(target)/libjava/config.cache
> cd $(target)/libjava/; ./config.status --recheck
> cd $(target)/libjava/; ./config.status
Ouch! You're missing g++ passed in from toplevel.
> Is this inappropriate usage of the autoconfigury? If so, what is the
> approved way to force it to rebuild the Makefile?
Simply touching Makefile.in works, doesn't it?
Andrew.