This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] libffi regen aclocal.m4 correctly.

From: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, aph at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:05:43 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch] libffi regen aclocal.m4 correctly.
References: <45806730.5080508@pop.agri.ch> <m31wn37elh.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20061213214849.GA25563@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <458077D4.3030809@avtrex.com>

David,
    I do regenerate Makefile.in in the approved patches.
Check the original posting of the patches...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00493.html

                  Jack

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:59:48PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
> >Tom,
> >   Actually the correct ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS are...
> >
> >ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .. -I ../config
> >
> 
> If that is really the case, then my understanding is that 
> ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in Makefile.am should be changed to reflect this also.
> 
> You would probably have to regenerate the Makefile.in also.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] libffi regen aclocal.m4 correctly.
  - From: David Daney

References:
- [patch] libffi regen aclocal.m4 correctly.
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: [patch] libffi regen aclocal.m4 correctly.
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch] libffi regen aclocal.m4 correctly.
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [patch] libffi regen aclocal.m4 correctly.
  - From: David Daney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]