This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Fix bytecode interpreter bitrot

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
Cc: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>, Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 29 Sep 2006 15:16:02 -0600
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix bytecode interpreter bitrot
References: <451C1DDD.6020303@redhat.com> <m3irj6pgg7.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <451D866A.8050409@avtrex.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

David> Correct me if I am wrong, but don't most of the gij test cases use it?

Keith meant the old "pure bytecode" interpreter.  You have to build
libgcj specially to get this -- the default is to use the direct
threaded interpreter, which is faster but uses more memory.

Tom

References:
- [RFA] Fix bytecode interpreter bitrot
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFA] Fix bytecode interpreter bitrot
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFA] Fix bytecode interpreter bitrot
  - From: David Daney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]