This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GNU Classpath 0.92 merge

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:50:25 -0700
Subject: Re: GNU Classpath 0.92 merge
References: <1155512435.2976.31.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org> <1155512661.6383.40.camel@celery.andrew.com>

On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 16:44 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 01:40 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:

> We are really trying to solve regressions and branching, seems illogical
> for gcj not to follow at least this part of the developmental cycle.

Also at least one of the P1 regressions are a libgcj bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27890

Can you at least look at that before applying the merge?

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNU Classpath 0.92 merge
  - From: Mark Wielaard

References:
- GNU Classpath 0.92 merge
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: GNU Classpath 0.92 merge
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]