Re: stacktrace vs. StackTrace

[Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>]

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:48:36AM -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> A recent checkin,
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r115235 | bryce | 2006-07-06 16:26:24 -0700 (Thu, 06 Jul 2006) | 9 lines
> 
> 2006-07-06  Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com>
> 
>         * stacktrace.cc (ClassForFrame): Remove commented-out code.
>         (UnwindTraceFn): Use _Unwind_GetIPInfo and adjust IP
>         only when needed.
>         (getLineNumberForFrame): Don't adjust IP here.
>         * testsuite/libjava.lang/StackTrace.java: New test case.
>         * testsuite/libjava.lang/StackTrace.out: Ditto.
> 
> 
> added new files 'StackTrace.java' and 'StackTrace.out' even though  
> there was already 'stacktrace.java' and 'stacktrace.out'.
> 
> On a case-insensitive filesystem, this causes 'svn update' to print:
> 
> svn: Failed to add file 'StackTrace.out': object of the same name  
> already exists
> 
> and the checkout fails.
> 
> In order to fix this, I'm about to run the following commands:
> 
> svn mv svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/libjava/testsuite/ 
> libjava.lang/{StackTrace,StackTrace2}.out
> svn mv svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/libjava/testsuite/ 
> libjava.lang/{StackTrace,StackTrace2}.java
> 
> and then probably I'll need to edit StackTrace2.java and/or  
> StackTrace2.out; I'll send a followup e-mail with that patch.
> 
> I can't test this in advance because that would involve having a  
> checked-out tree, so there may be some temporary breakage.   
> Fortunately it should only affect the testsuite.

Waht about "svn copy ...", editing the files, testing, "svn remove ..."?


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
http://www.worldforge.org/