This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows

From: Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:45:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows
References: <44A02481.207@gmail.com> <44A1EECF.2030303@gmail.com> <e7u1p4$svv$1@sea.gmane.org> <44A299FD.3040308@redhat.com> <17570.40176.239475.278312@dell.pink>

Andrew Haley wrote:

Bryce McKinlay writes: > > Hmm, is there some reason we can't just use uintptr_t? Doesn't GCC > ensure it is always available?

No. It isn't part of gcc, it's part of whatever C library is being used, and it's not guaranteed to be there. It's safer to do it this way.

Fair enough. Ranjit, can we call it _Jv_uintptr_t, then?

Bryce

References:
- [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: [MinGW] RFC/RFA: Get Partial Stack Traces on Windows
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]