This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Allocate Class instancs on heap; not conservatively scan DSOs

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:32:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Allocate Class instancs on heap; not conservatively scan DSOs
References: <17487.12956.143801.971137@zapata.pink> <20060426135926.GA19918@nevyn.them.org> <17487.32632.423297.866250@zapata.pink>

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:11:04PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I certainly hope so.
> 
> gcj is a less mature project than C and C++ and our development
> process is a very bad fit with the gcc release schedules.  Because of
> that (and the fact that gcj bugs are not release-critical) the rules
> regarding Stage 3 are somewhat more relaxed.  We discussed this at the
> GCC Summit a few years back, and the SC agreed to give gcj maintainers
> leeway to make our own decisions in this area.

OK, thanks.  Just checking!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Allocate Class instancs on heap; not conservatively scan DSOs
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Allocate Class instancs on heap; not conservatively scan DSOs
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Allocate Class instancs on heap; not conservatively scan DSOs
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]