This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: Gcj: add -static-libgcj option for linking.
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 08 Mar 2006 11:05:54 -0700
- Subject: Re: Patch: Gcj: add -static-libgcj option for linking.
- References: <440CBC96.4090706@avtrex.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "David" == David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> writes:
David> OK to commit?
Yes, with a couple minor changes.
David> gcc:
David> 2006-03-06 David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
David> * java/gcj.texi: Document -static-libgcj option.
gcc/java has its own ChangeLog. This entry should go there instead.
David> +Important Note: Static linking of libgcj may cause essential (to your
This should use @strong like:
@strong{Caution:} Static linking ...
(The manual recommends not using "Note" in an @strong..)
David> +program) parts of libgcj to be omitted. Caution must be used when
David> +using this option.
It would be nice to say more than this -- this is pretty vague and it
isn't clear what steps ought to be taken. Pointing folks at the wiki
page on gcj static linking would help.
Tom