This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch to make gcjh generate correct headers for mingw
TJ Laurenzo writes:
> I don't think a PR was ever opened for this. Looking at the ChangeLog
> file, no changes have been commited to 4.0 without referencing a PR.
> Should one be opened?
It's better to have one. Rather than copy all the info from the
discussion we've had here, it's quite acceptable to paste a URL that
points to the mailing list archive.
Andrew.
> On 11/8/05, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> > TJ Laurenzo writes:
> > > > I can't recall when the change to Logger
> > > > that exposed this problem was introduced but I think it may have been
> > > > after 4.0 (since Mohan has been doing mingw builds of GCC 4.0 for a
> > > > while now, I am inclined to think it was introduced after the split).
> > > > I'll check.
> > >
> > > Ok. The 4.0 branch does contain the versions of Logger.java and
> > > natLogger.cc that expose this problem. I'll check it in over there.
> > >
> > > Could you just give me a quick sanity check on Subversion as it treats
> > > branches differently than CVS? Here's how I understand it: I check
> > > out the sources from /branches/gcc-4_0-branch, apply the patch and
> > > commit in that tree. This is correct, right?
> >
> > Yes. That's all.