This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug

From: Chris Burdess <dog at bluezoo dot org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>,classpath patches <classpath-patches at gnu dot org>,GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 21:41:33 +0100
Subject: Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug
References: <17093.29654.946751.823936@zapata.pink> <42C5A93A.3010805@bothner.com> <17094.24786.21521.271880@zapata.pink> <m3acl56k77.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Tom Tromey wrote:
> Andrew> I have no opinions about the syntax of URIs, I only want to make
> Andrew> real-world applications work.  In this case we have to guess what Java
> Andrew> libraries are doing.
> 
> FWIW we've had some patch churn in this area in the past.
> It would be excellent to have a set of Mauve tests so that future
> changes don't break things that we know need to work.  In particular
> at least the current case should be added.

Perhaps we should also get some feedback from the W3C URI team on how
they feel the APIs apply to the concepts?
-- 
Chris Burdess

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cp-patches] Re: Absolute URL parsing bug
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Absolute URL parsing bug
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Absolute URL parsing bug
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Absolute URL parsing bug
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Absolute URL parsing bug
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]