This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Robot patchlet

From: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:09:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Robot patchlet
References: <m3oec1qxr5.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20050426162151.GD3022@asterix.konqueror.de>

On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 18:21 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:00:14AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Tom F. --
> > 
> > I noticed last night that Robot calls a static method, invokeAndWait,
> > in a non-static way.  This is ok, but a little bit confusing.  I want
> > to check in the appended, what do you think?  Is there some reason to
> > find the system event queue here?
> 
> When looking into the source of GtkToolkit.getSystemEventQueue() you see that it
> creates an event queue if there is none. I dont know if its garanteed that an
> system event queue exists already at this place. Just food for thinking.
> 

invokeAndWait calls Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemEventQueue()
anyway.  Tom: this patch looks fine to me.

Thanks,
Tom

References:
- Robot patchlet
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Robot patchlet
  - From: Michael Koch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]