This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] Use vague linkage for Java methods
- From: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:23:47 +0530
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use vague linkage for Java methods
- References: <422D0F4C.8040609@codesourcery.com> <422D32AE.40002@gmail.com> <20050308212056.GA6441@us.ibm.com> <39399b9d05030822087d6215f4@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0504052243430.40243@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <16979.44898.286760.587791@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
On Apr 6, 2005 3:14 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
> > > OK. See the attached patch.
> > > (Note that sourcebuild.texi also had an outdated link.)
> >
> > Ouch. Is it possible that nobody really reviewed/approved this for a
> > whole month, or did I miss some followups?
>
> I approved it in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00651.html
>
> but it was reverted when it caused a Darwin failure.
Gerald was only referring to my patch to the texinfo
documentation to correct the links to the Jacks
testsuite, as I understand it.
I should have perhaps re-threaded the message
containing the original patch.
Ranjit.
--
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://ranjitmathew.hostingzero.com/