This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC/RFT] Patch (java): Switch to new verifier

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:08:10 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] Patch (java): Switch to new verifier
References: <4222166D.2060207@gmail.com> <cvueq6$gr2$1@sea.gmane.org> <m34qfrz64m.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <39399b9d050305042669a65bb0@mail.gmail.com> <16937.52504.341007.659718@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 03:15:36PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> The rule is that a fetch from an unused variable may be deleted by the
> tree optimizers.  I could fix this fairly easily by making the target
> of a load volatile.

Or the load itself via casts: *(volatile T *)addr.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/RFT] Patch (java): Switch to new verifier
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

References:
- [RFC/RFT] Patch (java): Switch to new verifier
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: [RFC/RFT] Patch (java): Switch to new verifier
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFC/RFT] Patch (java): Switch to new verifier
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: [RFC/RFT] Patch (java): Switch to new verifier
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]