This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: RFA: versioning gcj classes
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:17:49 +0000
- Subject: Re: Patch: RFA: versioning gcj classes
- References: <m3pt01otas.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Tom Tromey writes:
> This is a slightly revised (function name change) version of a patch I
> sent last week concerning versioning gcj-compiled classes. See the
> original thread:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00082.html
>
> I've now run this through the test suite, in addition to the tests
> mentioned in my earlier post.
>
> Ok?
>
> Tom
>
> Index: gcc/java/ChangeLog
> from Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
>
> * java-tree.h (gcj_abi_version): Declare.
> * class.c (make_class_data): Push gcj_abi_version into "next"
> field.
> * decl.c (gcj_abi_version): New global.
> (parse_version): New function.
> (java_init_decl_processing): Call it.
> Include version.h.
> (GCJ_BINARYCOMPAT_ADDITION): New define.
Yes, thanks.
Might it be a good idea to rename the field "next" ?
Andrew.