This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: FYI: make gij tests run
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Dec 2004 11:28:21 -0700
- Subject: Re: Patch: FYI: make gij tests run
- References: <m3wtvcv5k0.fsf@localhost.localdomain><cq8evi$l8e$1@sea.gmane.org>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Ranjit" == Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@gmail.com> writes:
Ranjit> Minor nit: the problem with using cl2patch from cvs-utils
Ranjit> is that if the top of the ChangeLog has an entry from
Ranjit> you dated the same day, it merges the two ChangeLog entries
Ranjit> in an unintended way, as seems to have happened in this
Ranjit> case in the committed version.
Actually, this is just how I do things. I don't think cl2patch is to
blame.
I don't ordinarily create a new ChangeLog header if I commit one
patch right after another patch of mine. Instead I just make a new
paragraph in the same entry.
I always thought this was just ordinary practice. Making a new header
doesn't seem to gain very much though.
Tom