This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Java: [BC] Implement type assertion table
>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com> writes:
Bryce> Doing the work to lay out indirect-dispatch tables and such is also
Bryce> "linking", but I agree that having the distinction between generic
Bryce> class layout and that which is specific to the BC-ABI may make
Bryce> sense. However, there is already native-code/BC-ABI-specific
Bryce> functions are already in _Jv_Linker - link_symbol_table(),
Bryce> link_exception_table(), etc. We could separate these out into some
Bryce> other class/file, specific to the BC-ABI?
Yeah, good point. Go ahead and put your patch in as is.
Maybe we need another refactoring in here, but there's no need to
hold up this patch waiting for it.
Tom