Re: [patch] minimal test case for sha-1 and md5

[Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>]

Hi all,

Ranjit Mathew wrote:

> > 2004-10-12  Rutger Ovidius  <ovidr@users.sourceforge.net>
> >
> > 	PR libgcj/17903:
> > 	* testsuite/libjava.lang/md5test.java: New file.
> > 	* testsuite/libjava.lang/md5test.out: Likewise.
> > 	* testsuite/libjava.lang/shatest.java: Likewise.
> > 	* testsuite/libjava.lang/shatest.out: Likewise.
>
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
>   These tests fail for me because I run the testsuite
> without installing the built GCJ:
> -------------------------- 8< --------------------------
> WARNING: could not properly read security provider files:
>          file:///home/ranmath/gcc/lib/security/libgcj.security
>          file:///home/ranmath/gcc/lib/security/classpath.security
>          Falling back to standard GNU security provider
> -------------------------- 8< --------------------------

I apologize the troubles I caused with these test cases. I was not aware 
of all the side effects nor about the where to place. Just newbie in 
terms of security ....

I try to find a solution regarding test runs without installation. I 
have to trial and error, got already some hints from some experienced 
people on irc. Thanks.

In the worst case I offer to revert these test cases.
For me it shows once again, that one can struggle if he does not test 
back and forth. And I feel that a few tests in gcc silently rely on 
assumptions which are not correct. (e.g, I can not test g++ or libstdc++ 
without static libstdc++.a, on darwin) Also, the magic 
BinaryCompatibilitytest in mauve only works half way if the gcc is 
installed. No, I did not manage to solve this.

...

I try to bring up a solution asap, but I'm limited to night work.

And sorry again Tom,

Regards,
Andreas