This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [gui] Implement RescaleOp
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- Cc: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jerry Quinn <jlquinn at optonline dot net>, tromey at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:29:11 +0100
- Subject: Re: [gui] Implement RescaleOp
- References: <4158F2B6.7010700@optonline.net><m3r7omtmw6.fsf@localhost.localdomain><415A196C.9040702@optonline.net><200409301119.35829.konqueror@gmx.de><16731.53503.397693.334247@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><1096537307.1091.10.camel@localhost><16731.55142.234311.267025@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><1096637405.3888.11.camel@localhost><16737.15741.999964.33819@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><1096925722.1093.40.camel@localhost>
Mark Wielaard writes:
>
> On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 14:09, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Mark Wielaard writes:
> > > > The patches mailing list is for people to read. We try to make sure
> > > > that patches are in a form that can be merged, but its primary purpose
> > > > is for patch discussion.
> > >
> > > Fair. But a little note when what/if you commit without posting the
> > > precise patch would be appreciated.
> >
> > If I notice a small indentation error in a patch I wrote or a small
> > error in a comment I won't re-post the patch because it would waste a
> > lot of valuable people's time.
>
> Can we just agree that the merging between libgcj and GNU Classpath is
> also done by valuable people and that if possible we try to make their
> lives easier.
Of course. But I believe that their lives would be easier if they
ceased merging trees by applying patches from mailing lists. However,
that's entirely up to them.
> If posting the exact patch that you will commit is a big burden
> then I am sure we can work around it with CVS/commit script
> trickery. But if possible please just post what you intend to
> commit.
Always, of course.
Andrew.