This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Enable java on sh64-linux (Take 2)

From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:27:46 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Enable java on sh64-linux (Take 2)
References: <16732.7381.219841.977197@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <20041001.073612.35673489.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp> <m3zn36gxh0.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20041002.092711.15255785.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>

Kaz Kojima wrote:

BTW, it's surprising that no testcase could detect the above problem,
isn't it?  How about the testcase below?  It caught this mistake.

> * testsuite/libffi.call/negint.c: New test case.

This is fine with me. I welcome every little test case which helps detecting issues with libffi. Even caught by accident :)

Please ci.

Thanks,
Andreas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Enable java on sh64-linux (Take 2)
  - From: Kaz Kojima

References:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Enable java on sh64-linux (Take 2)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Enable java on sh64-linux (Take 2)
  - From: Kaz Kojima

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]