Re: [patch proposal] mark GCJ local code

[Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>]

Hi,

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 21:19, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> So, my proposal is to mark code in libgcj with GCJ LOCAL /GCJ LOCAL END 
> which should not be merged. (as already done in a few places, but we 
> should continue....)
> 
> I tried for java/lang/Runtime.java.
> 
> Would this be an improvement for others too?
> 
> This patchlet is just a try to get some opinions.

In general I like this idea. But for Runtime I think the real reason is
not as you mention "We diverge from Classpath for efficiency" but just
that our VMRuntime interface is either not good enough, or that nobody
took the time to really merge these last few parts and introduce a
libgcj specific VMRuntime implementation.

Cheers,

Mark

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part