This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Not really Re: PR java/17689 [4.0 Regression] New testsuitefailures indicate signal unwinding is broken

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 08:16, Andrew Haley wrote:

> I have an idea: I'll back out my patch and build and test again.
> 
Well, the change to get_tmt_for has to remain.  Unconditionally copying
TREE_THIS_VOLATILE from 'tag_type' was wrong.  So, at the very least
leave:

@@ -2138,7 +2141,7 @@ get_tmt_for (tree ptr, struct alias_info
     }

   /* If the pointed-to type is volatile, so is the tag.  */
-  TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (tag) = TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (tag_type);
+  TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (tag) |= TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (tag_type);

   /* Make sure that the type tag has the same alias set as the
      pointed-to type.  */


Diego.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]