This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: PATCH to process_gcj_properties
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Sep 2004 11:15:31 -0600
- Subject: Re: PATCH to process_gcj_properties
- References: <XSUS1X64HE95QM07ZWFB51ZKI4YYVYX.41572b6b@p733>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Mohan" == Mohan Embar <gnustuff@thisiscool.com> writes:
Mohan> Not that it matters in this case, but I've been surprised in
Mohan> the past by what I thought was an optimization and what
Mohan> gcc thought was an optimization:
Mohan> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-12/msg00213.html
Yeah, in cases where it might matter, micro-optimizations should
probably be accompanied by data or analysis of the assembly code.
Likewise for the contrary case, in particular in my opinion favorable
benchmark data should override the case against VMFile.
Tom