This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] [Java]: Create a new Java-specific ggc-none.c
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 18:50:53 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Java]: Create a new Java-specific ggc-none.c
- References: <05UPSRJIZEGFK1VCYUNJXTUOHEYW.413c9f5b@p733><877jr71ehe.fsf@codesourcery.com>
Zack Weinberg writes:
> Mohan Embar <gnustuff@thisiscool.com> writes:
>
> > Probably not infeasible (from the little I know, I think it's the
> > right thing to do), but definitely more work and over my head
> > without some guidance. I don't know politically how this is all
> > playing out, but given that the target date for going to Stage 3
> > was originally 5 September, I wanted to try to rock the boat as
> > little as possible (which is why my original patch had a
> > Java-specific ggc-none.c to avoid touching the top-level one).
> > When I venture into areas I'm not comfortable with and/or affect
> > a lot of people, I tend to want to tread lightly....
>
> I suppose that's fair. Let's hear what the Java maintainers think is
> the Right Thing, though.
I think your alternative 1 is perhaps more intrusive than I'd like.
Your alternative 2 seems quite reasonable. But I'm happy to consider
a patch that does either of these.
Mohan: this is a bug fix, so it is eligible for Stage 3 AFAICS.
Andrew.