Re: [PATCH] PR 9677 gcc-3.4.1-20040715-crazypaths.patch

[Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>]

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:30:19 -0400, Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com> wrote:
> I've seen those FAILs appear from time to time too. They seem to be a
> bit spurious - rebuilding from a clean tree often makes them dissappear.

I always build GCC from a clean tree and I have been
seeing these failures consistently in the last one week
at the least.


> I was unable to reproduce them outside of jacks. Does anyone know of a
> way to get jacks to be more verbose, so that it shows the exact compiler
> command it uses and compiler output that it gets?

The output is stored in the same folder as the tests. For
example, for the new failure "non-jls-argument-expansion-4" you
will find the output (as well as the inputs) in the folder:

  $JACKS/tests/non-jls/argument-expansion/

In my case, the input comes from the file "list4" which
contains "C1.java\r\nC2.java" ("\r\n" is the normal CR-LF
pair) and the output produced by GCJ is in the
file "@list4.gcj.err":

  C1.java:0: fatal error: can't open
  C2.java: No such file or directory
  compilation terminated.

(These files *are* there and simply contain "class C1 {}" and
"class C2 {}" respecively.)

Ranjit.