Re: [BC ABI] Merged with HEAD

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Ranjit" == Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@gmail.com> writes:

>> 1.  a definite assignment issue for which I've created a PR,
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15650

Ranjit> Is this a BC-only issue?

Yes, as the otable is only meaningful for the BC ABI.

I wonder if we could generate ordinary trees for the purposes of
check-init, then lower to BC trees afterward.  I tend to dislike our
approach of generating different trees up front depending on which
particular back end (BC ABI, old ABI, class files) we are targeting.

Tom