This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:15:58 -0800
Subject: Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
References: <402C1489.1070806@bothner.com> <20040213085050.GA26927@mail.konqueror.de> <402CF9A3.4000806@bothner.com> <20040213165455.GA30302@mail.konqueror.de> <402D0362.7030705@bothner.com> <20040213171348.GC30302@mail.konqueror.de>

Michael Koch wrote:

I'm unhappy with this because japitools will complain that our API is
different.

Not if japitools compares bytecodes.

An implicit default contructor generates the same bytecode
as an explicit default constructor.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Michael Koch

References:
- PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Michael Koch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]