Re: FYI: Patch: javax.print.attribute.standard - more missing classes.

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "graydon" == graydon hoare <graydon@redhat.com> writes:

graydon> Per Bothner wrote:
>> It might be nice to convert Mauve to use JUnit and/or be compatible
>> with it.  They're not that different, though Mauve is much simpler.
>> We could write a bridge so existing tests can run under JUnit.

graydon> I wrote this bridge recently, but I guess I included it in a
graydon> discussion of more intrusive changes to mauve, which in any event
graydon> seemed to be not desired by some portion of the community. see:
graydon> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2003-q4/msg00003.html

I wasn't trying to nuke your entire idea, sorry.  I welcome
improvements to Mauve, I was just laying out a few things that looked
like requirements back when, and perhaps still are (like everything
this is open for discussion...)

Tom