Re: FYI: Patch: javax.print.attribute.standard - more missing classes.

[graydon hoare <graydon at redhat dot com>]

Per Bothner wrote:

> It might be nice to convert Mauve to use JUnit and/or be compatible
> with it.  They're not that different, though Mauve is much simpler.
> We could write a bridge so existing tests can run under JUnit.

I wrote this bridge recently, but I guess I included it in a discussion 
of more intrusive changes to mauve, which in any event seemed to be not 
desired by some portion of the community. see:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2003-q4/msg00003.html

(another probably less-contentious alternative is to make the bridge go 
the other way, so junit tests appear as mauve tests)

-graydon