This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] swing frame fixes

From: Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud dot vandyck at ulg dot ac dot be>
To: classpath at gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, graydon at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:53:10 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swing frame fixes
Organization: STE-Formations Informatiques, ULg
References: <87ekw5s4je.fsf@dub.venge.net><20031119160432.24598@smtp.mail.ch.easynet.net><20031119161640.GA6307@mail.konqueror.de>

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:16:40 +0100
Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> wrote:

> Why adding stupid <p> ? Doesnt javadoc/gcjdoc add them automatically ?
> If javadoc does and gcjdoc doesnt we should fix the bug in gcjdoc and
> not use workarounds.

I don't remember javadoc does that. But as javadoc is in html, it's not
really a workaround. Maybe we can write <p>text</p>.

Cheers,

-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
   Formateur Cellule Programmation.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: [PATCH] swing frame fixes
  - From: Sascha Brawer
- Re: [PATCH] swing frame fixes
  - From: Michael Koch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]