[gmane.comp.gcc.bugs] [Bug java/12426] gcj allows access to private members from superclass

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

Wow, how did this one slip through the cracks?
I know I've looked through the PRs since 2001.  Geez.

Andrew, could you please review the patch in PR 1333?
This is embarrassing, even for us :-)

--- Begin Message ---

• From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
• Date: 26 Sep 2003 21:55:45 -0000
• Subject: [Bug java/12426] gcj allows access to private members from superclass
• Approved: news@gmane.org
• Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.bugs
• Original-received: from sources.redhat.com ([67.72.78.213])by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A30Z2-0007uC-00for <gcc-bugs@gmane.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 23:55:48 +0200
• Original-received: (qmail 11045 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 21:55:46 -0000
• Original-received: (qmail 11036 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2003 21:55:45 -0000
• Original-to: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
• Original-x-from: gcc-bugs-return-71349-gcc-bugs=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 26 23:55:48 2003
• References: <20030926214941.12426.jsturm@gcc.gnu.org>
• Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
• Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.bugs:35085

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12426


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-09-26 21:55 -------
This is a dup of bug 1333 which has a patch but no one has gotten around to update it.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1333 ***

--- End Message ---