This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi, On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 20:31, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@mckinlay.net.nz> writes: > > Maybe we can even revert the isNaN change in Math (a pet > peeve of mine) while we're at it. Please do! The comments in Classpath now don't match the implementation. The libgcj implementation is better imho. > My understanding is that JNI code isn't that great for IKVM, and > marking a method "native" isn't the desired approach there. So there > really is a conflict here. Presumably IKVM sets the standard, and not > us, since we're more willing and able to maintain divergences. It is not only for IKVM.NET. But also for Jaos and JikesRVM. In general marking things native will create headaches for any VM that has something different or more efficient then JNI. Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |