This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 'otable_syms' defined but not used

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 22 Sep 2003 14:42:48 -0600
Subject: Re: 'otable_syms' defined but not used
References: <200309201535.39537.konqueror@gmx.de><Pine.LNX.4.44.0309201517380.12859-100000@ops2.one-point.com><16239.17060.506609.724969@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><3F6F4774.5080102@bothner.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> But I see no benefit to having unused private fields, and
Per> we should warn about those.

They might be used only by native code.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'otable_syms' defined but not used
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- 'otable_syms' defined but not used
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: 'otable_syms' defined but not used
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: 'otable_syms' defined but not used
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: 'otable_syms' defined but not used
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]