This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inconsistency between javaprims.h and generated version

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>
To: neroden at twcny dot rr dot com (Nathanael Nerode)
Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:56:01 +1200
Subject: Re: Inconsistency between javaprims.h and generated version

On Monday, Sep 22, 2003, at 11:43 Pacific/Auckland, Nathanael Nerode wrote:

Regenerating javaprims.h using classes.pl gives this difference.
Should these classes be listed in javaprims.h or not?

Yes they should. gcjh assumes that anything starting with java.lang, java.io, and java.util is defined in javaprims.h. This just means that nobody has regenerated it since adding those classes.

Regards

Bryce.

References:
- Inconsistency between javaprims.h and generated version
  - From: Nathanael Nerode

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]