This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: new methods in gnu.java.net.Plain(Datagram)SocketImpl ?
- From: Mohan Embar <gnustuff at thisiscool dot com>
- To: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:32:50 -0500
- Subject: Re: Patch: new methods in gnu.java.net.Plain(Datagram)SocketImpl ?
- Reply-to: gnustuff at thisiscool dot com
Hi Anthony,
>On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 06:27, Mohan Embar wrote:
>> HI Michael and Anthony,
>>
>> >I would like to add one new method to PlainDatagramSocketImpl and
>> >PlainSocketImpl called getNativeFD:
>>
>> >public int getNativeFD();
>>
>> What ever became of this?:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-04/msg00242.html
>>
>> I remember that at the time, I liked the idea, but I can't remember
>> how the vote turned out.
>
>I wish you had said something, because nobody was supportive of this
>change. Most people felt it was unneccesary. I believe the consensus
>was that we will force people to change the library code when they want
>to use it with a system that does not fit our view of what the
>underlying platform is.
>
>To me, this looks like we're borrowing the worst idea from SWT. I have
>a hack for my non-conforming target, and I pity the fool who tries the
>64-bit Windows port.
>
>Michael: where are you going to use the result of getNativeFD()?
I'm sorry I didn't say anything. At the time, I was only a couple of
months into this and was a bit unsure about voicing my opinions in
front of a bunch of people who knew so much more than I did.
For the record: I fully support your proposal for all the reasons you
mentioned.
-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/